Lula's reelection triggers worst Brazilian market rout in years

Brazilian financial markets woke up this Monday to one of the most violent reversals of expectations in the country's recent history: with the reelection of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva for an unprecedented fourth term, Brazilian assets collapsed on international markets, unwinding in a matter of hours a months-long rally that had been built on the bet that power would change hands.

EWZ, the main Brazilian ETF traded in New York, plunged as much as 26% in U.S. pre-market trading, with Petrobras ADRs — also traded on the NYSE under tickers PBR and PBR-A — down nearly 20%, and Itaú Unibanco receipts sinking more than 25%. On the CME futures market in Chicago, the real traded as weak as R$5.56 per dollar, a depreciation of more than 10% from Friday's close — reversing the move that had taken the currency below R$5 in the weeks following the first round, when markets were pricing in a Flávio Bolsonaro victory. Fund managers interviewed by Folha and Brazil Journal expected B3's circuit breaker to be triggered right at the opening bell, with rate-sensitive domestic stocks — shopping malls, retailers and utilities — potentially accumulating losses of between 20% and 60%. Bradesco BBI cut its recommendation on Brazilian equities from overweight to neutral on Sunday night, citing that further upside will depend on concrete progress on the fiscal agenda and corporate earnings.

The magnitude of the reaction reveals the extent of the repositioning that had taken place since August. The stock market had rallied 15.3% since the confirmation of the candidacies, and the Tesouro Prefixado 2032 had retreated from 14.15% per year — before the first round — to 12.89% at Friday's close, while the Tesouro IPCA+ 2050 had compressed from IPCA + 7.06% to IPCA + 6.42%. All of this improvement is likely to be unwound, and managers such as Alfredo Menezes of Armor Capital are projecting a rise of at least 100 basis points in long rates. "Markets were not prepared for this," strategist Anna Wu of Floodlines Research told Bloomberg, arguing that the reaction goes beyond a reflex move, given medium-term fiscal and currency risks.

The central contradiction that Lula's fourth term brings with it is precisely what the market had been trying to discount: during the campaign, the president went so far as to call the obsession with primary surpluses "nonsense," while the electoral race turned the final days of the vote into a bidding war of promises — debt forgiveness for MEIs, fiscal relief for bars and restaurants, zero-fare transit via budget amendments — that amplified the risk of deteriorating public accounts as early as 2027. Analysts, economists and CEOs interviewed by Folha were unanimous in pointing out that what will determine the level of investment and output in the coming period is not the social promises, but the government's ability to deliver fiscal adjustment, stable rules and legal certainty — exactly what Lula's campaign avoided committing to with any clarity. The Economist coldly summarized the dilemma: "Brazil's strange economy needs serious reform," but neither Lula nor Flávio Bolsonaro "has the stomach" for it.

There is, however, a signal worth watching. According to Folha, the president-elect's team is already preparing a constitutional amendment that would allow the new government to target the center of the fiscal rule and freeze additional budget resources if necessary, as well as signal a reduction in subsidized credit. If implemented credibly, the measure could soften part of the shock. But the choice of finance minister — in an environment of distrust marked by electoral promises from both sides — will be the most immediate test of the government's fiscal seriousness. In parallel, the unified VAT rate under the tax reform is expected to be announced later this week, with the election unlocking an agenda that had been paralyzed — potentially the only vector of regulatory rationality in the short term.

The domestic environment is compounded by structural vulnerabilities that go beyond the electoral cycle. Brazilian manufacturing has plunged from 28th to 62nd place in the global ranking of industrial growth, according to data compiled by Folha, signaling that deindustrialization accelerated even during a period of relative expansion in domestic demand. In the labor market, the implementation of the end of the 6x1 shift system — with the workweek cut to 42 hours in December and to 40 hours by the end of 2027 — has already triggered negotiations in ABC metalworkers' unions and foreshadows cost pressure on labor-intensive sectors, with Secovi-SP estimates pointing to increases of up to 15% in condominium fees. The MEI system itself, heavily exploited as an electoral banner by both candidates, embeds a latent fiscal time bomb in the pension system that will require adjustments that neither of them has committed to making with any clarity.

On the geopolitical and commodities front, the dispute over Brazil's critical minerals has gained a new protagonist: India, which according to Folha, is seeking to turn diplomatic commitments into concrete business deals to reduce its dependence on China in energy transition supply chains. MMG, the Hong Kong-listed miner, is advancing in parallel with concessions to the European Commission to secure approval for its acquisition of Anglo American's nickel assets in Brazil — a deal with direct implications for the geopolitics of critical minerals and for Brazilian industrial sovereignty. And Copersucar, the world's largest trader of ethanol and sugar, closed a deal to supply ethanol as marine fuel at the Port of Santos, the largest in South America, positioning Brazil at the frontier of global shipping decarbonization.

What to watch in the coming hours and days is straightforward: the B3 opening bell and the possible triggering of the circuit breaker will gauge the immediate shock; the dollar's trajectory over the week will signal whether or not stabilizing flows emerge; and the name Lula picks for the finance ministry — along with the tone of the new government's first statements on the fiscal agenda — will determine whether the market is right to price in the deterioration it is now building into asset prices, or whether there is room for a more nuanced reading of the mandate that is beginning.

---